<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE7 javascript echo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/</link>
	<description>A tool for designers dealing with programmers dealing with designers...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>it's been round and used for a long time *EDITED (Nice Try) lol*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s been round and used for a long time *EDITED (Nice Try) lol*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Yeah I agree it's not a bug but it is quite interesting way to avoid filters as my example in comment 7.

The : thing is quite interesting too because you can directly call a function in the url without using () again another thing to be aware of when developing html/javascript filters.

Thanks everyone! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I agree it&#8217;s not a bug but it is quite interesting way to avoid filters as my example in comment 7.</p>
<p>The : thing is quite interesting too because you can directly call a function in the url without using () again another thing to be aware of when developing html/javascript filters.</p>
<p>Thanks everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirdarckcat</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>sirdarckcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Hi!

I also think it's not a bug.. the javascript URI will output the response of the function to the document, it is the desired behaivor, and iin that I base JaSiLDBG (http://jasildbg.googlepages.com)..

:P

javascript:anything:thisfunctionsdoesntexist:'';

The anything:something:whatever: think is because they are valid labels:

http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference:Statements:label

Greetz!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>I also think it&#8217;s not a bug.. the javascript URI will output the response of the function to the document, it is the desired behaivor, and iin that I base JaSiLDBG (http://jasildbg.googlepages.com)..</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.thespanner.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>javascript:anything:thisfunctionsdoesntexist:&#8221;;</p>
<p>The anything:something:whatever: think is because they are valid labels:</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference:Statements:label" rel="nofollow">http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference:Statements:label</a></p>
<p>Greetz!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Wenz</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Wenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>aah, the link I wanted to post was this one:

[a href="javas*removethis*cript:window.open(...)"]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aah, the link I wanted to post was this one:</p>
<p>[a href="javas*removethis*cript:window.open(...)"]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Wenz</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Wenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>many people stumble upon that when they try something like &lt;a href="window.open(...)" rel="nofollow"&gt; and get an output like [window object] instead. And as Stefan already said, all browsers do that (starting from Netscape 2) ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many people stumble upon that when they try something like <a href="window.open(...)" rel="nofollow"> and get an output like [window object] instead. And as Stefan already said, all browsers do that (starting from Netscape 2) <img src='http://www.thespanner.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Hi Stefan I just thought IE7 and now it appears Firefox has some odd behavior. In that it allows you to directly insert html or javascript code through the url without document.write.

I noticed it when I was testing the PHPIDS for code injection. I'm not sure if it is really a problem or not because you have to use javascript: anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stefan I just thought IE7 and now it appears Firefox has some odd behavior. In that it allows you to directly insert html or javascript code through the url without document.write.</p>
<p>I noticed it when I was testing the PHPIDS for code injection. I&#8217;m not sure if it is really a problem or not because you have to use javascript: anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Esser</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Esser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Ehmm I wonder what you are actually trying todo with your example.

It seems for me to work in both IE7 and latest FF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehmm I wonder what you are actually trying todo with your example.</p>
<p>It seems for me to work in both IE7 and latest FF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>That link translates to:-
javascript:'&#60;script&#62;alert(1)&#60;/script&#62;'

I know it's on the about:blank document but still I found it interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That link translates to:-<br />
javascript:&#8217;&lt;script&gt;alert(1)&lt;/script&gt;&#8217;</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s on the about:blank document but still I found it interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Ok pdp I believe you :)

But hey look at what can do, good for avoiding filters:-
&lt;a href="javascript:document:alert:String.fromCharCode(60,115,99,114,105,112,116,62,97,108,101,114,116,40,49,41,60,47,115,99,114,105,112,116,62)" rel="nofollow"&gt;Test&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok pdp I believe you <img src='http://www.thespanner.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But hey look at what can do, good for avoiding filters:-<br />
<a href="javascript:document:alert:String.fromCharCode(60,115,99,114,105,112,116,62,97,108,101,114,116,40,49,41,60,47,115,99,114,105,112,116,62)" rel="nofollow">Test</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/08/03/ie7-javascript-echo/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>nope :) it is not a bug. as I said the content will be rendered as html. You are still in about:blank! I think that I discussed thihs somewhere on GC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope <img src='http://www.thespanner.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> it is not a bug. as I said the content will be rendered as html. You are still in about:blank! I think that I discussed thihs somewhere on GC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
