<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox javascript sandboxing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/</link>
	<description>Javascript blog with messed up syntax inside</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>@dmp

I won&#039;t say that it is easy but I do think it is possible, the only difficulty I&#039;m having at the moment is the [] syntax. Once I can successfully identify arrays and objects using [] then it should be pretty secure. 

I&#039;ve not looked into Narcissus, I guess you need to run that on the server which is one of the downsides, I wanted a client side base solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dmp</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t say that it is easy but I do think it is possible, the only difficulty I&#8217;m having at the moment is the [] syntax. Once I can successfully identify arrays and objects using [] then it should be pretty secure. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not looked into Narcissus, I guess you need to run that on the server which is one of the downsides, I wanted a client side base solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmp</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/#comment-1622</link>
		<dc:creator>dmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/#comment-1622</guid>
		<description>Thanks Gareth.
I don&#039;t believe you can achieve anything secure (while still being useful) using regexps. There simply is too many ways to get back at the window.
Have you looked into Narcissus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gareth.<br />
I don&#8217;t believe you can achieve anything secure (while still being useful) using regexps. There simply is too many ways to get back at the window.<br />
Have you looked into Narcissus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>@dmp

Yeah I&#039;ve moved on from this technique. I now use RegExps to rewrite code into a safe form of javascript, it&#039;s still under development but it&#039;s getting pretty good

http://www.businessinfo.co.uk/labs/jsreg/jsreg.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dmp</p>
<p>Yeah I&#8217;ve moved on from this technique. I now use RegExps to rewrite code into a safe form of javascript, it&#8217;s still under development but it&#8217;s getting pretty good</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinfo.co.uk/labs/jsreg/jsreg.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinfo.co.uk/labs/jsreg/jsreg.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmp</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>dmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/02/22/firefox-javascript-sandboxing/#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t have your tester run.
It always output &quot;SyntaxError: syntax error&quot; whatever you have it swallow.

Either way, I&#039;m curious about how you actually prevent access to __parent__ (I don&#039;t think preventing &quot;_&quot; is enough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t have your tester run.<br />
It always output &#8220;SyntaxError: syntax error&#8221; whatever you have it swallow.</p>
<p>Either way, I&#8217;m curious about how you actually prevent access to __parent__ (I don&#8217;t think preventing &#8220;_&#8221; is enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

