<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sliceya CAPTCHA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/</link>
	<description>Javascript blog with messed up syntax inside</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: kaes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/#comment-1563</link>
		<dc:creator>kaes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=314#comment-1563</guid>
		<description>it is in fact easier for a computer to align the sliced images than it is for a human. a very simple computer vision algorithm would take the least squares color difference along the adjacent edges over all permutations.

if you&#039;d up the amount of slices, so that enumerating all the permutations becomes computationally infeasible, you could do it with a hillclimbing or simulated annealing algorithm. you&#039;d also have a puzzle that would take a human several hours to solve (so if they give the correct answer too quickly, you know they&#039;re a machine ...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is in fact easier for a computer to align the sliced images than it is for a human. a very simple computer vision algorithm would take the least squares color difference along the adjacent edges over all permutations.</p>
<p>if you&#8217;d up the amount of slices, so that enumerating all the permutations becomes computationally infeasible, you could do it with a hillclimbing or simulated annealing algorithm. you&#8217;d also have a puzzle that would take a human several hours to solve (so if they give the correct answer too quickly, you know they&#8217;re a machine &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=314#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>@DG

The question is incorrect, I didn&#039;t update it. I admit it is confusing.

@ef

A non-javascript version could be coded because it&#039;s just swapping image positions.  Marge should be accepted now as well as mis-spellings like marrge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DG</p>
<p>The question is incorrect, I didn&#8217;t update it. I admit it is confusing.</p>
<p>@ef</p>
<p>A non-javascript version could be coded because it&#8217;s just swapping image positions.  Marge should be accepted now as well as mis-spellings like marrge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ef</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>ef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=314#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>As much as I applaud your idea from a &quot;what if&quot; approach, every captcha that needs this amount of javascript to work is pure fail.

Images are already hard for some target audiences, but this is just insane if you&#039;re surfing with noscript or something. 
Plus the image of Marge Simpson&#039;s back wasn&#039;t recognised as &quot;marge&quot; - maybe that was the old version, but I&#039;d have to think some minutes to try to come to &quot;simpson(s)&quot; as answer to &quot;I think the image looks like a/some&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I applaud your idea from a &#8220;what if&#8221; approach, every captcha that needs this amount of javascript to work is pure fail.</p>
<p>Images are already hard for some target audiences, but this is just insane if you&#8217;re surfing with noscript or something.<br />
Plus the image of Marge Simpson&#8217;s back wasn&#8217;t recognised as &#8220;marge&#8221; &#8211; maybe that was the old version, but I&#8217;d have to think some minutes to try to come to &#8220;simpson(s)&#8221; as answer to &#8220;I think the image looks like a/some&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=314#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>I like it.

Is it not sufficient for just the image to be put &#039;together&#039; without the textual question at the bottom. Image assembly is pretty much unambigious, while the question isn&#039;t (Is the answer, &#039;[A ]president&#039;, &#039;Obama&#039;, [insert misspellings etc])?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.</p>
<p>Is it not sufficient for just the image to be put &#8216;together&#8217; without the textual question at the bottom. Image assembly is pretty much unambigious, while the question isn&#8217;t (Is the answer, &#8216;[A ]president&#8217;, &#8216;Obama&#8217;, [insert misspellings etc])?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=314#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>@Vinu Thomas 

Those issues can be fixed quite easily. It already accepts any case and I could allow any word e.g. Homer or Simpson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vinu Thomas </p>
<p>Those issues can be fixed quite easily. It already accepts any case and I could allow any word e.g. Homer or Simpson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinu Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinu Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=314#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>My concern is that the name has to be typed as is so even capitalizations, spaces and hypens count which filter humans as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concern is that the name has to be typed as is so even capitalizations, spaces and hypens count which filter humans as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=314#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>@Daniel 

The images are generated from a web search so they could be used depending which country they are from and even match specific content</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel </p>
<p>The images are generated from a web search so they could be used depending which country they are from and even match specific content</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/01/15/sliceya-captcha/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=314#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>Good idea, my only concern would be the bucket of images used. How would you ensure they cater for all ages, nationalities and territories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, my only concern would be the bucket of images used. How would you ensure they cater for all ages, nationalities and territories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

