Comments on: PHP self return of the slash http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/09/25/php-self-return-of-the-slash/ A tool for designers dealing with programmers dealing with designers... Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:00:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Jan! http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/09/25/php-self-return-of-the-slash/#comment-1629 Jan! Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:18:51 +0000 http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=533#comment-1629 I honestly don't understand why TBL and Fielding did this. I did not know about this behaviour; I thought any URI that did not start with a scheme, was a relative URI. (Note to others looking for the authoritative definition: see appendix C of http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt for an example.) That said, it does allow for some neat micro-optimisation for page weight weenies. I honestly don’t understand why TBL and Fielding did this. I did not know about this behaviour; I thought any URI that did not start with a scheme, was a relative URI.

(Note to others looking for the authoritative definition: see appendix C of http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt for an example.)

That said, it does allow for some neat micro-optimisation for page weight weenies.

]]> By: aj http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/09/25/php-self-return-of-the-slash/#comment-1628 aj Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:24:22 +0000 http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=533#comment-1628 can get a try to the example page ? or is a honey pot ~_~? can get a try to the example page ?
or is a honey pot ~_~?

]]>