<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The safety net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2010/02/04/the-safety-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2010/02/04/the-safety-net/</link>
	<description>Javascript blog with messed up syntax inside</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2010/02/04/the-safety-net/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=586#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>@Robert

The idea would be to only enable the SN when a specific action is taken like clicking on a link that takes you to a external web site, the SN is decided depending on the meta or http header of the parent site. For example twitter should have a meta identify as Social Network. 

This would allow sites to function as normal but prevent exploitation by limiting the user&#039;s &quot;first click&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert</p>
<p>The idea would be to only enable the SN when a specific action is taken like clicking on a link that takes you to a external web site, the SN is decided depending on the meta or http header of the parent site. For example twitter should have a meta identify as Social Network. </p>
<p>This would allow sites to function as normal but prevent exploitation by limiting the user&#8217;s &#8220;first click&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Jakobson</title>
		<link>http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2010/02/04/the-safety-net/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Jakobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/?p=586#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>This is exactly what the web needs, I dare say I have thought of something of this kind  myself, however there is the question of how this would fit the kind of old &quot;new trend&quot; of having the user manipulating their own data ( or data of their friends / etc .. ) from one application inside another ? 

Therefore, there should be an ability to have a list of outside inputs or URL-s which are &quot;trusted&quot; and &quot;accepted&quot; sources in the context of any concrete safety net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what the web needs, I dare say I have thought of something of this kind  myself, however there is the question of how this would fit the kind of old &#8220;new trend&#8221; of having the user manipulating their own data ( or data of their friends / etc .. ) from one application inside another ? </p>
<p>Therefore, there should be an ability to have a list of outside inputs or URL-s which are &#8220;trusted&#8221; and &#8220;accepted&#8221; sources in the context of any concrete safety net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

